Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs GeForce GTX 675M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Plus Graphics 950

15

1,789

0.0%

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Iris Graphics 6100

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Iris Plus Graphics 640

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

1,855

+3.7%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M

#119

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

293%

#121

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

265%

#122

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

265%

#126

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

241%

#127

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

239%

#129

GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#131

GeForce GT 335M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

#139

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 675M is significantly newer (2012 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 675M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 675M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 950.

Insight	Iris Plus Graphics 950	GeForce GTX 675M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 675M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Plus Graphics 950 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 950 and GeForce GTX 675M

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

GeForce GTX 675M

The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 scores 1,789 and the GeForce GTX 675M reaches 1,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is built on Generation 11.0 while the GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	1,789	1,855+4%
Architecture	Generation 11.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	10 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS+8%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	32	64+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 675M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	96 GB/s
Bus Width	System	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: Quick Sync 7 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	Quick Sync 7	No NVENC (Fermi)
Decoder	Quick Sync 7	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 82°C.