Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Pro Graphics 580

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌542.9% higher power demand at 45W vs 7W.

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Iris Pro Graphics 580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 7W instead of 45W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (1,985 vs 1,947), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Pro Graphics 580 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Pro Graphics 580

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,947 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 scores 1,985 and the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 reaches 1,947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 580	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
G3D Mark Score	1,985+2%	1,947
Process Node	14 nm+	7 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 580	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 580	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 draws 45W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3's 7W — a 146.2% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 580	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
TDP	45W	7W-84%
Recommended PSU	0W-100%	1W
Power Connector	None	Integrated
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	44.1	278.1+531%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics 580 came in at $0, while the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 launched at $599. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 580 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 3.3 (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3) — the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics 580	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
MSRP	$0-100%	$599
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	3.3
Codename	Skylake GT4e	—
Release	September 1 2015	December 6 2018
Ranking	#707	#915

Search Iris Pro Graphics 580 on Amazon

Search Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.