Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Popular choices:
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Pro Graphics 580 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Iris Pro Graphics 580
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,947 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 scores 1,985 and the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 reaches 1,947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,985+2% | 1,947 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 draws 45W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3's 7W — a 146.2% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 7W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 1W |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 44.1 | 278.1+531% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 launched at $599 and now averages $300. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 costs 100+% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 6.5 (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3) — the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 6.5 |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | — |
| Release | September 1 2015 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #707 | #915 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
