Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | Vega (2017−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Pro Graphics 580 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE
Iris Pro Graphics 580
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.
Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 2100 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,941 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 scores 1,985 and the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE reaches 1,941 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE uses Vega, both on 14 nm+ vs 7 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 512 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,985+2% | 1,941 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+13% | 512 |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 2100 MHz+121% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 draws 45W versus the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE's 15W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 15W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 1W |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 44.1 | 129.4+193% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE) — the Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE offers NaN% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | Vega |
| Release | September 1 2015 | January 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #707 | #545 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon RX Vega 11 Ryzen 5 3400GE
