Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs FirePro R5000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro R5000

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

98%

#109

Quadro M6000 24GB

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600

97%

#110

Quadro GV100

MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999

88%

#257

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

6130%

#272

FirePro R5000

MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150

100%

#273

GRID M6-8Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

99%

#276

GRID K120Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $20

97%

#278

Tesla M60

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250

97%

#279

FirePro V7900

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

94%

#280

GRID M60-8A

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

92%

#281

GRID P6-4Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

92%

#283

Quadro K4000

MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100

89%

#286

GRID P4-2Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235

88%

#287

Tesla C2070

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro R5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro R5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	FirePro R5000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Benchmark Check

FirePro R5000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and FirePro R5000

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.

FirePro R5000

The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the FirePro R5000 reaches 2,647 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the FirePro R5000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 768 (FirePro R5000).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	FirePro R5000
G3D Mark Score	2,715+3%	2,647
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	GCN 1.0
Process Node	10 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	80	768+860%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	FirePro R5000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro R5000 has 4 GB. The FirePro R5000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	FirePro R5000
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 12 (FirePro R5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	FirePro R5000
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro R5000).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	FirePro R5000
Encoder	Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	Quick Sync Video (Gen 12)	UVD
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the FirePro R5000's 150W — a 137.1% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 350W (FirePro R5000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 279mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	FirePro R5000
TDP	28W-81%	150W
Recommended PSU	0W-100%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	279mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85	85°C
Perf/Watt	97.0+451%	17.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro R5000 launched at $1099 and now averages $150. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 17.6 (FirePro R5000) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	FirePro R5000
MSRP	$0-100%	$1099
Avg Price (30d)	$0-100%	$150
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	17.6
Codename	Tiger Lake Xe	Pitcairn
Release	August 15 2020	February 25 2013
Ranking	#584	#619