Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs FirePro V9800
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Popular choices:
FirePro V9800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V9800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V9800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V9800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V9800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and FirePro V9800
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.
FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs scores 2,715 and the FirePro V9800 reaches 2,727 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the FirePro V9800 uses TeraScale 3, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 1,280 (FirePro V9800).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,715 | 2,727 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 80 | 1280+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V9800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V9800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 11.2 (FirePro V9800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs None (FirePro V9800). Decoder: Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) | None |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs draws 28W versus the FirePro V9800's 150W — a 137.1% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 350W (FirePro V9800). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 28W-81% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0+433% | 18.2 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro V9800 launched at $3499 and now averages $250. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs costs 100+% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) vs 10.9 (FirePro V9800) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $3499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 10.9 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | Cayman |
| Release | August 15 2020 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #584 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs and FirePro V9800
