Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro K5100M

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Quadro K5100M

2013Core: 771 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Xe Graphics G7

3,311

+1.4%

HD Graphics 630

Iris Plus Graphics 645

Iris Plus Graphics 950

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

3,264

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank 282 and the Quadro K5100M is on rank 28, so the Quadro K5100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

93%

#272

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

656%

#274

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

594%

#275

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

593%

#279

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

539%

#280

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

535%

#282

Iris Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $200|Avg: $100

100%

#283

Radeon R9 M395

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

99%

#285

GeForce GT 755M SLI

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

99%

#286

GeForce GTX 950A

MSRP: $159|Avg: $30

99%

#288

Radeon 540X

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

97%

#289

GeForce 930MX

MSRP: $80|Avg: $25

96%

#291

GeForce MX250

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

95%

#296

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5100M

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

86%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

82%

#13

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

362%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

76%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

75%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

75%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

74%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

73%

#28

Quadro K5100M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

97%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

90%

#36

T600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $180

79%

#43

P106-100

MSRP: $224|Avg: $30

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5100M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K5100M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro K5100M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

Quadro K5100M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro K5100M

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the Quadro K5100M reaches 3,264 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro K5100M uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5100M).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro K5100M
G3D Mark Score	3,311+1%	3,264
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Kepler
Process Node	10 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	96	1536+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro K5100M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5100M has 8 GB. The Quadro K5100M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro K5100M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	8 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5100M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro K5100M
DirectX	12.1	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5100M). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K5100M).

Feature	Iris Xe Graphics G7	Quadro K5100M
Encoder	QuickSync	1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder	QuickSync	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Quadro K5100M's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (Quadro K5100M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.