Iris Xe MAX Graphics
VS
Radeon HD 6850

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon HD 6850

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6850

2010

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
96%
#129
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
303%
#131
275%
#132
274%
#136
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
249%
#137
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
247%
#139
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
97%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
97%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The Iris Xe MAX Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6850 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6850 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon HD 6850
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity
Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 6850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $40 for the Iris Xe MAX Graphics, it costs 38% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 57.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon HD 6850
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+57.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon HD 6850

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6850

The Radeon HD 6850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 127W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,938 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Radeon HD 6850 reaches 1,938 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the Radeon HD 6850 uses TeraScale 2, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6850). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1.488 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6850).

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon HD 6850
G3D Mark Score
1,972+2%
1,938
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TeraScale 2
Process Node
10 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768
960+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.534 TFLOPS+70%
1.488 TFLOPS
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
48
48
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon HD 6850
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6850 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 6850 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6850) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon HD 6850
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 6850).

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon HD 6850
Encoder
QuickSync
Decoder
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 6850's 127W — a 134.2% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6850). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon HD 6850
TDP
25W-80%
127W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
78.9+416%
15.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 6850 launched at $179 and now averages $25. The Radeon HD 6850 costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 77.5 (Radeon HD 6850) — the Radeon HD 6850 offers 57.2% better value. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon HD 6850
MSRP
$55-69%
$179
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$25-38%
Performance per Dollar
49.3
77.5+57%
Codename
DG1
Barts
Release
October 31 2020
October 21 2010
Ranking
#686
#692