
Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon HD 6850

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6850
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The Iris Xe MAX Graphics likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6850 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6850 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $40 for the Iris Xe MAX Graphics, it costs 38% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 57.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+57.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon HD 6850

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

Radeon HD 6850
The Radeon HD 6850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 127W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,938 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Radeon HD 6850 reaches 1,938 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the Radeon HD 6850 uses TeraScale 2, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6850). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1.488 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6850).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972+2% | 1,938 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 960+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.534 TFLOPS+70% | 1.488 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6850 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 6850 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6850) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 6850).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | — |
| Decoder | QuickSync | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Radeon HD 6850's 127W — a 134.2% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 500W (Radeon HD 6850). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-80% | 127W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9+416% | 15.3 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 6850 launched at $179 and now averages $25. The Radeon HD 6850 costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 77.5 (Radeon HD 6850) — the Radeon HD 6850 offers 57.2% better value. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-69% | $179 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $25-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3 | 77.5+57% |
| Codename | DG1 | Barts |
| Release | October 31 2020 | October 21 2010 |
| Ranking | #686 | #692 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













