Iris Xe MAX Graphics
VS
RadeonT RX Vega 11

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs RadeonT RX Vega 11

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
VS
AMD

RadeonT RX Vega 11

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1251 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
96%
#129
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
303%
#131
275%
#132
274%
#136
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
249%
#137
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
247%
#139
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
97%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
97%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT RX Vega 11.

InsightIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeonT RX Vega 11
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Longevity
Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe MAX Graphics and RadeonT RX Vega 11

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

AMD

RadeonT RX Vega 11

The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,917 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the RadeonT RX Vega 11 reaches 1,917 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 uses GCN 5.0, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 704 (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1251 MHz.

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeonT RX Vega 11
G3D Mark Score
1,972+3%
1,917
Architecture
Generation 12.1
GCN 5.0
Process Node
10 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768+9%
704
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.534 TFLOPS+44%
1.761 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1650 MHz+32%
1251 MHz
ROPs
24+200%
8
TMUs
48+9%
44

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeonT RX Vega 11
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeonT RX Vega 11
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the RadeonT RX Vega 11's 35W — a 33.3% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1W (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeonT RX Vega 11
TDP
25W-29%
35W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
78.9+44%
54.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs Infinity (RadeonT RX Vega 11) — the RadeonT RX Vega 11 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeonT RX Vega 11
MSRP
$55
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
49.3
Infinity
Codename
DG1
Raven
Release
October 31 2020
May 10 2018
Ranking
#686
#673