M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen 5 3600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M4 Pro (12 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with M4 Pro 16-core GPU, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 Pro (12 cores) across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 18,904).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while M4 Pro (12 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M4 Pro (12 cores) moves to none and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is M4 Pro (12 cores) better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Yes. M4 Pro (12 cores) is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 99% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 85.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, M4 Pro (12 cores) is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M4 Pro (12 cores) is the stronger fit. You are getting 99% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M4 Pro (12 cores) is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. M4 Pro (12 cores) comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 3600 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 Pro (12 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M4 Pro (12 cores)

The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The M4 Pro (12 cores) packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the M4 Pro (12 cores) has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores) (base: 2.592 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (12 cores) scores 32,853 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 60% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores). Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,904 vs 9,500 (66.2% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,812 vs 1,295, a 98.6% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,076 vs 1,898 (165.5% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)).

Feature	M4 Pro (12 cores)	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+100%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.51 GHz+7%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.592 GHz	3.6 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	—	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB	512K (per core)+12700%
Process	3 nm-57%	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	—	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	32,853+86%	17,685
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,904+99%	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	3,812+194%	1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi	20,076+958%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 Pro (12 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the M4 Pro (12 cores) versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the M4 Pro (12 cores) supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple SoC (M4 Pro (12 cores)) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

Feature	M4 Pro (12 cores)	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	none	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8000+150%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The M4 Pro (12 cores) includes integrated graphics (M4 Pro 16-core GPU), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	M4 Pro (12 cores)	Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	M4 Pro 16-core GPU	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Apple Virtualization	Yes
Target Use	High-end Content Creation	Gaming/Budget Workstation