M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon Gold 5320
M4 Pro (14 cores)
Xeon Gold 5320
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar M4 Pro (14 cores)
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 5320
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | M4 Pro (14 cores) | Xeon Gold 5320 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,834) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | M4 Pro (14 cores) | Xeon Gold 5320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,834) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon Gold 5320
M4 Pro (14 cores)
The M4 Pro (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,127 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon Gold 5320
The Xeon Gold 5320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 39 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 37,558 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The M4 Pro (14 cores) packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5320 offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon Gold 5320 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5320 — a 27.8% clock advantage for the M4 Pro (14 cores) (base: 2.59 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5320 is built on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (14 cores) scores 38,127 against the Xeon Gold 5320's 37,558 — a 1.5% lead for the M4 Pro (14 cores).
| Feature | M4 Pro (14 cores) | Xeon Gold 5320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 26 / 52+86% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+32% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.59 GHz+18% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 39 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | — | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 38,127+2% | 37,558 |
Memory & Platform
The M4 Pro (14 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5320 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8533 on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 5320 — the M4 Pro (14 cores) supports 97.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5320 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 64 — 195.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5320). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 5320) — the Xeon Gold 5320 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M4 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) and C621A (Xeon Gold 5320).
| Feature | M4 Pro (14 cores) | Xeon Gold 5320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8533+191% | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | 6144+9500% |
| RAM Channels | 0 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 5320 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5320). The M4 Pro (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)), while the Xeon Gold 5320 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (14 cores) rivals Core Ultra 7 258V; Xeon Gold 5320 rivals EPYC 7452.
| Feature | M4 Pro (14 cores) | Xeon Gold 5320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon Gold 5320
