M4 Pro (14 cores)
VS
EPYC 7313

M4 Pro (14 cores) vs EPYC 7313

M4 Pro (14 cores)

14 Cores14 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024
VS
AMD

EPYC 7313

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M4 Pro (14 cores)

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
110%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
109%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
105%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
102%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
101%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
101%
#180
M4 Pro (14 cores)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
97%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
95%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
89%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7313

#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
110%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
110%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
109%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
109%
#266
EPYC 7C13
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
106%
#267
Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP: $3245|Avg: N/A
106%
#268
Xeon w5-2565X
MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1389
105%
#269
Xeon Silver 4416+
MSRP: $1186|Avg: $1176
104%
#270
Xeon E-2176G
MSRP: $367|Avg: $405
103%
#271
EPYC 7401
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $450
103%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
100%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
99%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
99%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
97%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $1130
97%
#281
EPYC 7402P
MSRP: $1280|Avg: $1090
95%
#282
Xeon w5-3525
MSRP: $1339|Avg: $1392
94%
#283
Xeon W-1290T
MSRP: $546|Avg: $494
94%
#284
Xeon D-1581
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
92%
#285
Xeon w5-3535X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: N/A
91%
#286
Xeon w5-2465X
MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1499
91%
#287
EPYC 9355P
MSRP: $2998|Avg: $3026
90%
#288
Xeon w7-2595X
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $1600
90%
#289
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
MSRP: $2899|Avg: $2699.99
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($764) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7313 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightM4 Pro (14 cores)EPYC 7313
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($764)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+)

💎 Value Proposition

The M4 Pro (14 cores) ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($764 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightM4 Pro (14 cores)EPYC 7313
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($764)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC 7313

M4 Pro (14 cores)

The M4 Pro (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,127 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

EPYC 7313

The EPYC 7313 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,938 points. Launch price was $1,083.

Processing Power

The M4 Pro (14 cores) packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the EPYC 7313 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7313 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313 — a 19.5% clock advantage for the M4 Pro (14 cores) (base: 2.59 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7313 is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (14 cores) scores 38,127 against the EPYC 7313's 38,938 — a 2.1% lead for the EPYC 7313.

FeatureM4 Pro (14 cores)EPYC 7313
Cores / Threads
14 / 14
16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+22%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.59 GHz
3 GHz+16%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm+
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
38,127
38,938+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
26,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,736
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,264
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 Pro (14 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7313 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8533 on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7313 — the M4 Pro (14 cores) supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 8 (EPYC 7313). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 128 (EPYC 7313) — the EPYC 7313 offers 128 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M4 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) and SP3,Milan (EPYC 7313).

FeatureM4 Pro (14 cores)EPYC 7313
Socket
none
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
8533+213225%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
64
4096 GB+6710886300%
RAM Channels
0
8
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7313). The M4 Pro (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)), while the EPYC 7313 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7313 targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (14 cores) rivals Core Ultra 7 258V; EPYC 7313 rivals Xeon Gold 6326.

FeatureM4 Pro (14 cores)EPYC 7313
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d (macOS)
AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU
Target Use
Server / High-load computing