MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum

MediaTek Kompanio 838

8 / 8

5,343

0.0%

Core i5-6200U

Athlon X4 950

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i7-3632QM

Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 / 24

38,955

+629.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,343 vs 38,955).

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +149.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than MediaTek Kompanio 838?

Yes. Ryzen 9 5900X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 149.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 629.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 149.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the stronger fit. You are getting 629.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 5900X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $549 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 149.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 74.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture, while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the MediaTek Kompanio 838 scores 5,343 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 151.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	MediaTek Kompanio 838	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	4.8 GHz+118%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.7 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	—	64 MB
L2 Cache	—	512K (per core)
Process	—	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	5,343	38,955+629%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,888

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (MediaTek Kompanio 838) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.