MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs GeForce RTX 2060

CPU

GPU

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

2010Core: 700 MHz

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

0.0%

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

14,114

+46946.7%

GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is positioned at rank #732 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9550

#722

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

36190%

#724

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

32807%

#725

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

32720%

#729

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

29753%

#730

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

29550%

#732

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

100%

#733

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

100%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

97%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

73%

#737

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

67%

#738

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

67%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

53%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

50%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

33%

#743

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

33%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

27%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

20%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

20%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

17%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 2060 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 46946.7% higher G3D Mark score and 9423.8% more VRAM (6 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9550.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce RTX 2060
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-46946.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+46946.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3820.6% better value per dollar than the MOBILITY RADEON 9550.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce RTX 2060
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+3820.6%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($10)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9550 and GeForce RTX 2060

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 scores 30 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 46946.7%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score	30	14,114+46947%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Turing
Process Node	40 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	800	1920+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	6.451 TFLOPS+476%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	40	120+200%
L1 Cache	0.08 MB	1.9 MB+2275%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	3 MB+1100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 9423.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	6 GB+9424%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	336 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	3 MB+1100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce RTX 2060
DirectX	9.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)+33%
Max Displays	0	4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 104.8% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce RTX 2060
TDP	50W-69%	160W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	1mm	229mm
Height	—	113mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	72
Perf/Watt	0.6	88.2+14600%

💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 costs 91.7% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 3820% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).