MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is positioned at rank #732 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9550
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 41683.3% higher G3D Mark score and 12598.4% more VRAM (8 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9550.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-41683.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+41683.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1899.2% better value per dollar than the MOBILITY RADEON 9550.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1899.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9550 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 scores 30 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 41683.3%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30 | 12,535+41683% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2560+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+712% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.08 MB | 2.5 MB+3025% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 12598.4% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.063 GB | 8 GB+12598% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 12 Ultimate+33% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 66°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 96.4+15967% |
Value Analysis
The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 costs 95.2% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 1900% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9550 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-60% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-95% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.0 | 60.0+1900% |
| Codename | Broadway | GA106 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #846 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON 9550 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
