MOBILITY RADEON 9550 vs GeForce GTX 1650

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

2010Core: 700 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

0.0%

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

7,869

+26130.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is positioned at rank #732 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9550

#722

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

36190%

#724

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

32807%

#725

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

32720%

#729

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

29753%

#730

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

29550%

#732

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

100%

#733

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

100%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

97%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

73%

#737

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

67%

#738

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

67%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

53%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

50%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

33%

#743

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

33%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

27%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

20%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

20%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

17%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 26130% higher G3D Mark score and 6249.2% more VRAM (4 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9550.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-26130%)	✅Leading raw performance (+26130%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+6249.2%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3397.3% better value per dollar than the MOBILITY RADEON 9550.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+3397.3%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($10)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY RADEON 9550 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9550 and GeForce GTX 1650

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9550 scores 30 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 26130%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	30	7,869+26130%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Turing
Process Node	40 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	800	896+12%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+166%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	56+40%
L1 Cache	80 KB	896 KB+1020%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 6249.2% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	4 GB+6249%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	9.0	12+33%
Max Displays	0	3

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 40% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9550	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	1mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	0.6	104.9+17383%

💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The MOBILITY RADEON 9550 costs 86.7% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.0 (MOBILITY RADEON 9550) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3396.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).