Moore Threads MTT S70 vs FirePro M5100
Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:
FirePro M5100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The FirePro M5100 is significantly newer (2013 vs 0). The FirePro M5100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M5100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S70 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M5100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $140 for the Moore Threads MTT S70, it costs 79% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 365.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S70 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+365.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($140) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S70 and FirePro M5100
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
FirePro M5100
The FirePro M5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,874 points.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S70 scores 1,880 and the FirePro M5100 reaches 1,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is built on MUSA while the FirePro M5100 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 640 (FirePro M5100). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (FirePro M5100).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,874 |
| Architecture | MUSA | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+460% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+1056% | 0.992 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 224+1300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 224+460% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 3.5 MB+1300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S70 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M5100 has 2 GB. The FirePro M5100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro M5100) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3.5 MB+1300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M5100). Decoder: MUSA Gen2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs H.264,VC-1 (FirePro M5100).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen2 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S70 draws 220W versus the FirePro M5100's 150W — a 37.8% difference. The FirePro M5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 350W (FirePro M5100). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 150W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 82mm |
| Height | 112mm | 70mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.5 | 12.5+47% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 MSRP and currently averages $140, while the FirePro M5100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The FirePro M5100 costs 78.6% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 62.5 (FirePro M5100) — the FirePro M5100 offers 366.4% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $345 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $140 | $30-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.4 | 62.5+366% |
| Codename | Chunxiao | Venus |
| Release | sem dados | October 16 2013 |
| Ranking | #694 | #701 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Moore Threads MTT S70 and FirePro M5100
