CPU
GPU
NVS 810
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 810 is positioned at rank 309 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is on rank 403, so the NVS 810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar NVS 810
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
| Insight | NVS 810 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Generation 7.5 (2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $80), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 96.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | NVS 810 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200
NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 28 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,192+2% | 1,172 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2+60% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+38% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1200 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2+300% | 4 |
| TMUs | 32 ×2 | 40+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 810 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The NVS 810 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB. The NVS 810 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 77.6% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W | 30W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 198mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 39.1+123% |
Value Analysis
The NVS 810 launched at $700 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.9 (NVS 810) vs 29.3 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 offers 96.6% better value. The NVS 810 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | NVS 810 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $700 | $150-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $40-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 29.3+97% |
| Codename | GM107 | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | November 4 2015 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #826 | #835 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on NVS 810 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200
