P104-100 vs GRID T4-2Q
P104-100
Popular choices:
GRID T4-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The P104-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID T4-2Q.
| Insight | P104-100 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The P104-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P104-100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $600), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 5916.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P104-100 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5916.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P104-100 and GRID T4-2Q
P104-100
The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
GRID T4-2Q
The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.
Graphics Performance
The P104-100 scores 3,678 and the GRID T4-2Q reaches 3,668 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P104-100 is built on Pascal while the GRID T4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P104-100) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | P104-100 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,678 | 3,668 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2048+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS+38% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+47% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 120 | 128+7% |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB | 768 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P104-100 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | P104-100 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The P104-100 draws 30W versus the GRID T4-2Q's 225W — a 152.9% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P104-100) vs 350W (GRID T4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | P104-100 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-87% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 122.6+652% | 16.3 |
Value Analysis
The P104-100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GRID T4-2Q launched at $845 and now averages $600. The P104-100 costs 98.3% less ($590 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 367.8 (P104-100) vs 6.1 (GRID T4-2Q) — the P104-100 offers 5929.5% better value. The P104-100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | P104-100 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $845 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-98% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 367.8+5930% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | December 12 2017 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #529 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P104-100 and GRID T4-2Q
