
P104-100 vs FirePro S7150

P104-100
Popular choices:

FirePro S7150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S7150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P104-100.
| Insight | P104-100 | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The P104-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P104-100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $459), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4378% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P104-100 | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4378%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($459) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P104-100 and FirePro S7150

P104-100
The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Graphics Performance
The P104-100 scores 3,678 and the FirePro S7150 reaches 3,770 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P104-100 is built on Pascal while the FirePro S7150 uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P104-100) vs 2,048 (FirePro S7150). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100) vs 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150).
| Feature | P104-100 | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,678 | 3,770+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2048+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS+77% | 3.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120 | 128+7% |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB+41% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P104-100 | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P104-100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S7150 has 4 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P104-100) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P104-100 | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The P104-100 draws 30W versus the FirePro S7150's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P104-100) vs 350W (FirePro S7150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | P104-100 | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-80% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 122.6+388% | 25.1 |
Value Analysis
The P104-100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 and now averages $459. The P104-100 costs 97.8% less ($449 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 367.8 (P104-100) vs 8.2 (FirePro S7150) — the P104-100 offers 4385.4% better value. The P104-100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | P104-100 | FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-98% | $459 |
| Performance per Dollar | 367.8+4385% | 8.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | Tonga |
| Release | December 12 2017 | February 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #529 | #521 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












