P104-100 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P104-100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 113.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P104-100.

Insight	P104-100	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-113.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+113.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The P104-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $75 for the GeForce GTX 1650, it costs 87% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 250.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	P104-100	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+250.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($10)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

P104-100 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of P104-100 and GeForce GTX 1650

P104-100

The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the P104-100 scores 3,678 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 113.9%. The P104-100 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P104-100) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	P104-100	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	3,678	7,869+114%
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1920+114%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS+123%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+4%	1665 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	120+114%	56
L1 Cache	720 KB	896 KB+24%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P104-100	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The P104-100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P104-100) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P104-100	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P104-100 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P104-100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	P104-100	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	122.6+17%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The P104-100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The P104-100 costs 86.7% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 367.8 (P104-100) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the P104-100 offers 250.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).