Phenom X3 8750 vs Xeon X5272

AMD

Phenom X3 8750

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X5272

80 WW2007
Similar parts
·······

Phenom X3 8750 vs Xeon X5272 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Phenom X3 8750 vs Xeon X5272 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Phenom X3 8750 vs Xeon X5272: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Phenom X3 8750

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $977 less on MSRP ($195 MSRP vs $1,172 MSRP).
  • Delivers 498.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $1,172 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5272 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,445 vs 1,451).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Xeon X5272

2007

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($1,172 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5272 better than Phenom X3 8750?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5272 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Phenom X3 8750 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5272 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5272 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon X5272 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon X5272 comes in 501.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,172 MSRP versus $195 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Phenom X3 8750 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 498.5% better value on paper (7.4 vs 1.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2+.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Phenom X3 8750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Phenom X3 8750 vs Xeon X5272 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Phenom X3 8750

The Phenom X3 8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon X5272

The Xeon X5272 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Phenom X3 8750 is built on the Toliman (2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Phenom X3 8750 scores 1,445 against the Xeon X5272's 1,451 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X5272. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8750 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5272.

FeaturePhenom X3 8750Xeon X5272
Cores / Threads
3 / 3
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
6 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Toliman (2008)
PassMark
1,445
1,451
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X3 8750 uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5272 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom X3 8750Xeon X5272
Socket
AM2+
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom X3 8750) / true (Xeon X5272). Primary use case: Xeon X5272 targets Server.

FeaturePhenom X3 8750Xeon X5272
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Phenom X3 8750 was priced at $195, while the Xeon X5272 came in at $1172. On launch pricing ($195 vs $1172), Phenom X3 8750 was $977 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom X3 8750 delivers 7.4 pts/$ vs 1.2 pts/$ for the Xeon X5272 — making the Phenom X3 8750 the 142.7% better value option.

FeaturePhenom X3 8750Xeon X5272
MSRP
$195-83%
$1172
Performance per Dollar
7.4+517%
1.2
Release Date
2008
2007

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.