Quadro 3000M vs RADEON 9600 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 3000M vs RADEON 9600 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 3000M vs RADEON 9600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 3000M

2011

Why buy it

✅1596.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

RADEON 9600 XT

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 3000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1596.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2760% in PassMark G3D (1,001 vs 35), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9600 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 84 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9600 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro 3000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro 3000M vs RADEON 9600 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 3000M

The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.

RADEON 9600 XT

The RADEON 9600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $899.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro 3000M scores 1,001 versus the RADEON 9600 XT's 35 — the Quadro 3000M leads by 2760%. The Quadro 3000M is built on Fermi while the RADEON 9600 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro 3000M) vs 5,376 (RADEON 9600 XT). Raw compute: 0.432 TFLOPS (Quadro 3000M) vs 51.48 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600 XT).

Feature	Quadro 3000M	RADEON 9600 XT
G3D Mark Score	1,001+2760%	35
Architecture	Fermi	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	40 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	240	5376+2140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.432 TFLOPS	51.48 TFLOPS+11817%
ROPs	32	192+500%
TMUs	40	336+740%
L1 Cache	0.31 MB	3 MB+868%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	6 MB+1100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 3000M	RADEON 9600 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 3000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9600 XT carries 256 MB. Quadro 3000M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 3000M and 64-bit on the RADEON 9600 XT. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 3000M) vs 6 MB (RADEON 9600 XT) — the RADEON 9600 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 3000M	RADEON 9600 XT
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+700%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	6 MB+1100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 3000M draws 75W versus the RADEON 9600 XT's 300W — a 120% difference. The Quadro 3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 3000M) vs 350W (RADEON 9600 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro 3000M	RADEON 9600 XT
TDP	75W-75%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Perf/Watt	13.3+13200%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9600 XT (2022 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro 3000M	RADEON 9600 XT
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	GF104	Navi 31
Release	February 22 2011	November 3 2022
Ranking	#888	#21

Search Quadro 3000M on Amazon

Search RADEON 9600 XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.