Quadro FX 1700
VS
GeForce Go 7800 GTX

Quadro FX 1700 vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1700 is positioned at rank 395 and the GeForce Go 7800 GTX is on rank 179, so the GeForce Go 7800 GTX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700

#380
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
47655%
#395
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
100%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
97%
#397
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
87%
#398
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
77%
#399
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
77%
#400
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
77%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
74%
#402
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
74%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
71%
#404
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
65%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
65%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
58%
#408
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
55%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7800 GTX

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1036%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
996%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
984%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
982%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
980%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
975%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
962%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
959%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
950%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
947%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
936%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
934%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
917%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
917%
#93
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#94
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#95
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#164
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1143%
#179
GeForce Go 7800 GTX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#181
Radeon HD 8310E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#183
GeForce GT 610
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
97%
#185
Radeon HD 6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#186
Radeon HD 8450G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#187
Radeon HD 4830
MSRP: $130|Avg: $20
95%
#188
GeForce GT 140
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
95%
#189
GeForce GT 530
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#190
GeForce GT 620
MSRP: $59|Avg: $20
94%
#191
Radeon R7 A8-7600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $25
93%
#192
GeForce GTS 240
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
92%
#193
RADEON HD6370D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
#194
Radeon HD 7310
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7800 GTX.

InsightQuadro FX 1700GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1700 and GeForce Go 7800 GTX

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7800 GTX

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1700 scores 216 and the GeForce Go 7800 GTX reaches 210 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce Go 7800 GTX uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 2,880 (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7800 GTX).

FeatureQuadro FX 1700GeForce Go 7800 GTX
G3D Mark Score
216+3%
210
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
2880+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS+759%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
80
240+200%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 1700GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 1700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1700) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce Go 7800 GTX) — the GeForce Go 7800 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 1700GeForce Go 7800 GTX
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1.5 MB+500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 1700GeForce Go 7800 GTX
DirectX
10_0+11%
9.0c
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1700 draws 189W versus the GeForce Go 7800 GTX's 250W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7800 GTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro FX 1700GeForce Go 7800 GTX
TDP
189W-24%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
1.1+38%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce Go 7800 GTX is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 1700GeForce Go 7800 GTX
MSRP
$699
Avg Price (30d)
$500
Codename
GT200B
GK110B
Release
November 11 2008
November 7 2013
Ranking
#815
#278