
Quadro K2000 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Quadro K2000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K2000 is positioned at rank #261 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 550 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $500), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1869.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1869.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 550 Ti
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the GeForce GTX 550 Ti reaches 1,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582+2% | 1,558 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7327 TFLOPS+6% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro K2000) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264 (Quadro K2000) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | — |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the GeForce GTX 550 Ti's 116W — a 77.8% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 550 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 51W-56% | 116W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0+131% | 13.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce GTX 550 Ti launched at $149 and now averages $25. The GeForce GTX 550 Ti costs 95% less ($475 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Quadro K2000) vs 62.3 (GeForce GTX 550 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 550 Ti offers 1846.9% better value. The Quadro K2000 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $149-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $25-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 62.3+1847% |
| Codename | GK107 | GF116 |
| Release | March 1 2013 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #756 | #761 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















