Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Quadro K2000
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K2000 is positioned at rank #261 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $500 for the Quadro K2000, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 95.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000 and Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U reaches 1,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582+2% | 1,546 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1408+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7327 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+532% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 88+175% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.5 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U has 512 MB. The Quadro K2000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) — the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.5 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U's 100W — a 64.9% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 51W-49% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0+100% | 15.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U launched at $250 and now averages $250. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U costs 50% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Quadro K2000) vs 6.2 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) — the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U offers 93.8% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $250-58% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $250-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 6.2+94% |
| Codename | GK107 | Navi 14 |
| Release | March 1 2013 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #756 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2000 and Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
