Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U

Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U Performance Spectrum

Quadro K2000

2 GB 51

1,582

+2.3%

GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

TITAN V

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U

0.5 GB 100

1,546

0.0%

Radeon R5 M435

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8570 Dual

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2000

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 51W instead of 100W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
139.6% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U

2020

Why buy it

✅160.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 134.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Quadro K2000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌96.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 51W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 160.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K2000 instead at 1,582 vs 1,546, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 134.1% (6.2 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U

The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U reaches 1,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U).

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
G3D Mark Score	1,582+2%	1,546
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	1408+267%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7327 TFLOPS	4.632 TFLOPS+532%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	88+175%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U carries 512 MB. Quadro K2000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000 and System on the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) — the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1.5 MB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U's 100W — a 64.9% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
TDP	51W-49%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	202mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	31.0+100%	15.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K2000 came in at $599, while the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U was 58.3% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro K2000) vs 6.2 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) — the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U offers 138.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K2000	Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
MSRP	$599	$250-58%
Performance per Dollar	2.6	6.2+138%
Codename	GK107	Navi 14
Release	March 1 2013	May 28 2020
Ranking	#756	#336

Search Quadro K2000 on Amazon

Search Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.