Quadro K6000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Quadro K6000
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K6000 is positioned at rank 319 and the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is on rank 9, so the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K6000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design.
| Insight | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (265mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $300), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 194.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+194.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K6000 and GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K6000 scores 7,993 and the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design reaches 7,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K6000 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K6000) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,993+2% | 7,853 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+125% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS+37% | 3.789 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1480 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 240+200% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 480 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K6000 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) — a 64.8% advantage for the Quadro K6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s+65% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (Quadro K6000) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12.1+10% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K6000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K6000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 265mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 80W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 265mm | 0mm |
| Height | 110mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 35.5 | 98.2+177% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design costs 66.7% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.6 (Quadro K6000) vs 78.5 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers 195.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5265 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $100-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6 | 78.5+195% |
| Codename | GK110B | GP106 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #318 | #401 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K6000 and GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
