Quadro M4000 vs GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M4000 is positioned at rank #159 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 232% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M4000.
| Insight | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-232%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+232%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $350 for the Quadro M4000, it costs 43% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 480.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+480.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000 and GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 232%. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,679 | 22,172+232% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280 | 5888+360% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+714% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1725 MHz+70% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 184+130% |
| L1 Cache | 0.47 MB | 5.8 MB+1134% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 112.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M4000) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 448 GB/s+112% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 75% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-55% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.8 | 100.8+51% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M4000 launched at $791 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 42.9% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Quadro M4000) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 480.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $791 | $499-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $200-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1 | 110.9+481% |
| Codename | GM204 | GA104 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #392 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M4000 and GeForce RTX 3070
