Quadro M4000 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M4000 is positioned at rank #159 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 204.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M4000.
| Insight | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-204.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+204.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $350 for the Quadro M4000, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 280.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+280.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 204.1%. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,679 | 20,312+204% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280 | 4864+280% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+549% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1665 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 80 | 152+90% |
| L1 Cache | 0.47 MB | 4.8 MB+921% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 112.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M4000) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 448 GB/s+112% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-50% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 75-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.8 | 101.6+52% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M4000 launched at $791 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 20% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Quadro M4000) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 279.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $791 | $399-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $280-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1 | 72.5+280% |
| Codename | GM204 | GA104 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #392 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M4000 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
