Quadro M4000 vs Radeon RX 7600
Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M4000 is positioned at rank #159 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 148.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M4000.
| Insight | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-148.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+148.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $350 for the Quadro M4000, it costs 29% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 247.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+247.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000 and Radeon RX 7600
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 148.3%. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,679 | 16,581+148% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+771% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 2655 MHz+162% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 512 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 36.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 288 GB/s+36% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 49.1% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-39% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.8 | 100.5+50% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M4000 launched at $791 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 28.6% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Quadro M4000) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 247.1% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $791 | $269-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $250-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1 | 66.3+247% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #392 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M4000 and Radeon RX 7600
