
Quadro M4000

T600
Quadro M4000 vs T600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M4000 vs T600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro M4000 vs T600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌295.5% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.
- ❌54.5% longer card at 241mm vs 156mm.
T600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $591 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 280.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 241mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M4000 vs T600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

T600
The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the T600 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,679+4% | 6,425 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS+46% | 1.709 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1335 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 640 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the T600 carries 4 GB. Quadro M4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000 and 128-bit on the T600. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M4000) vs 1 MB (T600) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12 (12_1) (T600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) (T600). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs H.264,HEVC (T600).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the T600's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 40W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 65°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 66.8 | 160.6+140% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M4000 came in at $791, while the T600 launched at $200. On MSRP, T600 was 74.7% cheaper ($591 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.4 (Quadro M4000) vs 32.1 (T600) — the T600 offers 282.1% better value. The newer card here is T600 (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $791 | $200-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4 | 32.1+282% |
| Codename | GM204 | TU117 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #392 | #378 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














