Quadro M4000M vs RTX A400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M4000M vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M4000M vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M4000M

2015

Why buy it

✅79.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 79.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (6,148 vs 5,983), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro M4000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M4000M vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M4000M

The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M4000M scores 6,148 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000M) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1762 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M4000M	RTX A400
G3D Mark Score	6,148+3%	5,983
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1,280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.496 TFLOPS	2.706 TFLOPS+8%
Boost Clock	1013 MHz	1762 MHz+74%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	80+233%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M4000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro M4000M	RTX A400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000M and 128-bit on the RTX A400.

Feature	Quadro M4000M	RTX A400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M4000M draws 100W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000M) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro M4000M	RTX A400
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	61.5	119.7+95%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro M4000M	RTX A400
MSRP	—	$135
Codename	GM204	GA107
Release	August 18 2015	April 16 2024
Ranking	#392	#397

Search Quadro M4000M on Amazon

Search RTX A400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.