
Quadro M5000M vs Radeon RX 570

Quadro M5000M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M5000M is positioned at rank #13 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5000M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M5000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 570.
| Insight | Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M5000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5000M and Radeon RX 570

Quadro M5000M
The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

Radeon RX 570
The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M5000M scores 7,056 and the Radeon RX 570 reaches 6,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570). Boost clocks: 1051 MHz vs 1244 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,056+1% | 6,967 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.995 TFLOPS | 5.095 TFLOPS+70% |
| Boost Clock | 1051 MHz | 1244 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+13% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M5000M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 570 has 4 GB. The Quadro M5000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro M5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5000M) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-17% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 70.6+22% | 58.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #353 | #356 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















