Quadro M5000M
VS
Radeon RX 570

Quadro M5000M vs Radeon RX 570

NVIDIA

Quadro M5000M

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1051 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 570

2017Core: 1168 MHzBoost: 1244 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M5000M is positioned at rank #13 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5000M

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
209%
#13
Quadro M5000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M5000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 570.

InsightQuadro M5000MRadeon RX 570
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M5000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5000M and Radeon RX 570

NVIDIA

Quadro M5000M

The Quadro M5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1051 MHz. It has 1,536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,056 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 570

The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M5000M scores 7,056 and the Radeon RX 570 reaches 6,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 2.995 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000M) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570). Boost clocks: 1051 MHz vs 1244 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon RX 570
G3D Mark Score
7,056+1%
6,967
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1,536
2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.995 TFLOPS
5.095 TFLOPS+70%
Boost Clock
1051 MHz
1244 MHz+18%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
96
128+33%
L1 Cache
576 KB+13%
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon RX 570
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M5000M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 570 has 4 GB. The Quadro M5000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon RX 570
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon RX 570
DirectX
12.1
12
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
5+25%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro M5000M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro M5000M) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon RX 570
Encoder
NVENC 5.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.265,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M5000M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro M5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5000M) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon RX 570
TDP
100W-17%
120W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
0mm
241mm
Height
0mm
120mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
70.6+22%
58.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro M5000MRadeon RX 570
MSRP
$169
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
GM204
Polaris 20
Release
August 18 2015
April 18 2017
Ranking
#353
#356