Quadro M6000 24GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000 24GB
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 171.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M6000 24GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 24GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-171.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+171.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $590 versus $600 for the Quadro M6000 24GB, it costs 2% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 176.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M6000 24GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+176.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 24GB and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 171.6%. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,625 | 31,578+172% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 7680+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.844 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+486% |
| Boost Clock | 1114 MHz | 2610 MHz+134% |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 256+7% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 7.5 MB+582% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M6000 24GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M6000 24GB comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 59% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 317 GB/s | 504 GB/s+59% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12/1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 13.1% difference. The Quadro M6000 24GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-12% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 46.5 | 110.8+138% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 1.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.4 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 175.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M6000 24GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999 | $799-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $590-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.4 | 53.5+176% |
| Codename | GM200 | AD104 |
| Release | March 5 2016 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #233 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M6000 24GB and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
