Quadro M6000 24GB vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000 24GB

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

190%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

186%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

180%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

179%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

176%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

162%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

156%

#102

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500

137%

#103

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999

127%

#104

Radeon Pro W6900X

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000

124%

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

122%

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

115%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

111%

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

101%

#109

Quadro M6000 24GB

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600

100%

#110

Quadro GV100

MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999

91%

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

89%

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

86%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

85%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

84%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

83%

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

67%

#117

L40

MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174

45%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M6000 24GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 47.7% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (24 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	Quadro M6000 24GB	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+47.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-47.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+500%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $600 for the Quadro M6000 24GB, it costs 88% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 441.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro M6000 24GB	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+441.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M6000 24GB Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M6000 24GB and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro M6000 24GB

The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro M6000 24GB scores 11,625 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Quadro M6000 24GB leads by 47.7%. The Quadro M6000 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1114 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	11,625+48%	7,869
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3072+243%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.844 TFLOPS+129%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1114 MHz	1665 MHz+49%
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	256+357%	56
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+25%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M6000 24GB comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 147.7% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+500%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	317 GB/s+148%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12/1	12
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 4.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M6000 24GB draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Quadro M6000 24GB	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	46.5	104.9+126%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 87.5% less ($525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.4 (Quadro M6000 24GB) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 440.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).