
Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is positioned at rank #134 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 47% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P2000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-47%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+47%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $150 for the Quadro P2000 (móvel), it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 194% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+194%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 47%. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353 | 7,869+47% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+29% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.974 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1291 MHz | 1665 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+29% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 432 KB | 896 KB+107% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB+25% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4 | 104.9+47% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 193.8% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $149-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $75-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.7 | 104.9+194% |
| Codename | GP106 | TU117 |
| Release | February 15 2019 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #399 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















