
Quadro P2200
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2200 is positioned at rank #72 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P2200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P2200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (5 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $65 versus $227 for the Quadro P2200, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 241.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+241.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($227) | ✅More affordable ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and GeForce GTX 1060 5GB

Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,175 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB reaches 9,175 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1709 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,386+2% | 9,175 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.822 TFLOPS | 4.375 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 1709 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 40 | 40 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 5 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 250mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-38% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 201mm | 250mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 125.1+64% | 76.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $227, while the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB launched at $249 and now averages $65. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB costs 71.4% less ($162 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (Quadro P2200) vs 141.2 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers 241.9% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $249-42% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $227 | $65-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3 | 141.2+242% |
| Codename | GP106 | GP106 |
| Release | June 10 2019 | December 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #281 | #289 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















