Quadro P2200 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P2200 is positioned at rank #72 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P2200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Quadro P2200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (5 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $42 versus $227 for the Quadro P2200, it costs 81% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 445.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+445.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($227) | ✅More affordable ($42) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti reaches 9,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,386 | 9,469 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2880+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.822 TFLOPS | 5.345 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz+61% | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 40 | 48+20% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+100% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 1.5 MB+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB. The Quadro P2200 offers 66.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB+67% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 1.5 MB+20% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 201mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-10% | 83°C |
| Perf/Watt | 125.1+230% | 37.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $227, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti launched at $699 and now averages $42. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti costs 81.5% less ($185 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (Quadro P2200) vs 225.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers 446% better value. The Quadro P2200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429-39% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $227 | $42-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3 | 225.5+446% |
| Codename | GP106 | GK110B |
| Release | June 10 2019 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #281 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2200 and GeForce GTX 780 Ti
