Quadro P2200 vs Intel Arc Pro A60
Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P2200 is positioned at rank 72 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 is on rank 60, so the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2200
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (5 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $227 versus $380 for the Intel Arc Pro A60, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 65.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P2200 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($227) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and Intel Arc Pro A60
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 reaches 9,493 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,386 | 9,493+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.822 TFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS+120% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 2050 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 12 MB+860% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB. The Quadro P2200 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB+25% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 12 MB+860% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 201mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-42% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 201mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 125.1+71% | 73.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP and currently averages $227, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380 and now averages $380. The Quadro P2200 costs 40.3% less ($153 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (Quadro P2200) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Quadro P2200 offers 65.2% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $380-11% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $227-40% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3+65% | 25.0 |
| Codename | GP106 | DG2-256 |
| Release | June 10 2019 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #281 | #275 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2200 and Intel Arc Pro A60
