Quadro P4000 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

129%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

128%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

126%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

125%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

121%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

118%

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

109%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

107%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

105%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

103%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

102%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

100%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

97%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

95%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

91%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

90%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

89%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

88%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

86%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

84%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

78%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

74%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

64%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 45.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	Quadro P4000	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+45.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-45.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $290 for the Quadro P4000, it costs 74% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 166.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P4000	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+166.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($290)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P4000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro P4000

The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Quadro P4000 leads by 45.3%. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P4000	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	11,431+45%	7,869
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792+100%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.304 TFLOPS+78%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1480 MHz	1665 MHz+13%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112+100%	56
L1 Cache	672 KB	896 KB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P4000	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P4000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Quadro P4000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Quadro P4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P4000	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P4000	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.0	12
Vulkan	1.0	1.4+40%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Quadro P4000	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Quadro P4000	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	105W	75W-29%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	241mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	108.9+4%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P4000 launched at $815 MSRP and currently averages $290, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 74.1% less ($215 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.4 (Quadro P4000) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 166.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).