G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P4000 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P4000 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P4000

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅5.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $815 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P4000 instead at 11,431 vs 11,162, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) and DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025), while Quadro P4000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P4000 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P4000

The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 2025 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P4000	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	11,431+2%	11,162
Architecture	Pascal	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	16 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1792	2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.304 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS+56%
Boost Clock	1480 MHz	2025 MHz+37%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112+75%	64
L1 Cache	0.66 MB	2 MB+203%
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P4000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro P4000	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4000 and 64-bit on the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P4000	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P4000	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.0	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.0	1.4+40%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	Quadro P4000	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 100% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro P4000	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	105W	35W-67%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	108.9	318.9+193%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile (2024 vs 2017).

Feature	Quadro P4000	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
MSRP	$815	—
Codename	GP104	AD107
Release	February 6 2017	February 26 2024
Ranking	#239	#254

Search Quadro P4000 on Amazon

Search RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.