
Quadro P600 vs GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

Quadro P600
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition.
| Insight | Quadro P600 | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $60), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 49.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P600 | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+49.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 926 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 384 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 0.7112 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,318 | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS+75% | 0.7112 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+350% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P600) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) — the Quadro P600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P600) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP5.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition's 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 350W (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-20% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.0+25% | 66.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition launched at $149 and now averages $40. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition costs 33.3% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (Quadro P600) vs 82.8 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) — the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition offers 49.7% better value. The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $40-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.3 | 82.8+50% |
| Codename | GP107 | GK107 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | November 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #558 | #735 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















