Quadro P600 vs GeForce GTX 750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 750.

Insight	Quadro P600	GeForce GTX 750
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $60), it costs 42% less, resulting in a 71.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P600	GeForce GTX 750
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+71.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)	✅More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P600 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 750 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and GeForce GTX 750

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

GeForce GTX 750

The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the GeForce GTX 750 reaches 3,312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 750 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 750). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 1.111 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1085 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P600	GeForce GTX 750
G3D Mark Score	3,318	3,312
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS+12%	1.111 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1620 MHz+49%	1085 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	144 KB	256 KB+78%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P600	GeForce GTX 750
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P600) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750) — the GeForce GTX 750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P600	GeForce GTX 750
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P600) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P600	GeForce GTX 750
DirectX	12_1	12_0
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

Feature	Quadro P600	GeForce GTX 750
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	NVENC 3rd Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	—	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the GeForce GTX 750's 55W — a 31.6% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro P600	GeForce GTX 750
TDP	40W-27%	55W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	145mm	145mm
Slots	1	1
Perf/Watt	83.0+38%	60.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GeForce GTX 750 launched at $120 and now averages $35. The GeForce GTX 750 costs 41.7% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (Quadro P600) vs 94.6 (GeForce GTX 750) — the GeForce GTX 750 offers 71.1% better value. The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).