Quadro P600 vs Quadro M2000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2000M

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

99%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

98%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

94%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

92%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

90%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

89%

#162

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2166%

#177

Quadro M2000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

97%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

96%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

94%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

93%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

93%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

92%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

91%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

90%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M2000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P600.

Insight	Quadro P600	Quadro M2000M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M2000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P600 Benchmark Check

Quadro M2000M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and Quadro M2000M

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the Quadro M2000M reaches 3,410 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the Quadro M2000M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 640 (Quadro M2000M). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1098 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P600	Quadro M2000M
G3D Mark Score	3,318	3,410+3%
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS	1.405 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock	1620 MHz+48%	1098 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	144 KB	320 KB+122%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P600	Quadro M2000M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000M has 4 GB. The Quadro M2000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P600) vs 2 MB (Quadro M2000M) — the Quadro M2000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P600	Quadro M2000M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P600) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M2000M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P600	Quadro M2000M
DirectX	12_1	12 (11_0)
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600) vs 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2000M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP6.

Feature	Quadro P600	Quadro M2000M
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	—	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the Quadro M2000M's 55W — a 31.6% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 350W (Quadro M2000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.