Quadro P600 vs GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro P600
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 568.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P600.
| Insight | Quadro P600 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-568.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+568.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 100.5% better value per dollar than the Quadro P600.
| Insight | Quadro P600 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+100.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and GeForce RTX 3070
Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P600 scores 3,318 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 568.2%. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,318 | 22,172+568% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 5888+1433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+1533% |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz | 1725 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 184+667% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 5.8 MB+4043% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P600) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P600) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 138.5% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-82% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.0 | 100.8+21% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The Quadro P600 costs 70% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (Quadro P600) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-70% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.3 | 110.9+101% |
| Codename | GP107 | GA104 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #558 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P600 and GeForce RTX 3070
