
Quadro P600 vs GeForce GTX 485M SLI

Quadro P600
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P600 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Quadro P600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P600.
| Insight | Quadro P600 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 485M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and GeForce GTX 485M SLI

Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

GeForce GTX 485M SLI
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the GeForce GTX 485M SLI reaches 3,360 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 485M SLI uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,318 | 3,360+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P600) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP4.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the GeForce GTX 485M SLI's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-60% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 92°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.0+147% | 33.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | — |
| Codename | GP107 | N11E-GTX-A1 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | January 6 2011 |
| Ranking | #558 | #542 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















