Quadro P600
VS
HD Graphics 530

Quadro P600 vs HD Graphics 530

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
VS

HD Graphics 530

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 530.

InsightQuadro P600HD Graphics 530
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and HD Graphics 530

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

Intel

HD Graphics 530

The HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the HD Graphics 530 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the HD Graphics 530 uses Generation 9.0, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 192 (HD Graphics 530). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600) vs 0.3648 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 530). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P600HD Graphics 530
G3D Mark Score
3,318
3,311
Architecture
Pascal
Generation 9.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS+241%
0.3648 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1620 MHz+71%
950 MHz
ROPs
16+433%
3
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P600HD Graphics 530
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 530 has 0 MB. The Quadro P600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureQuadro P600HD Graphics 530
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P600) vs 12 (HD Graphics 530). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro P600HD Graphics 530
DirectX
12_1
12
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600) vs Quick Sync (Skylake) (HD Graphics 530). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs Gen 9.

FeatureQuadro P600HD Graphics 530
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
Quick Sync (Skylake)
Decoder
NVDEC 4th Gen
Gen 9
Codecs
H.264,HEVC (8-bit),VP8
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the HD Graphics 530's 15W — a 90.9% difference. The HD Graphics 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 1W (HD Graphics 530). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro P600HD Graphics 530
TDP
40W
15W-63%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
145mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
83.0
220.7+166%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the HD Graphics 530 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The HD Graphics 530 costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (Quadro P600) vs Infinity (HD Graphics 530) — the HD Graphics 530 offers Infinity% better value. The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro P600HD Graphics 530
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$60
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
55.3
Infinity
Codename
GP107
Skylake GT2
Release
February 7 2017
September 1 2015
Ranking
#558
#887