Quadro P600 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Quadro P600
Popular choices:
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs uses modern memory architecture. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
| Insight | Quadro P600 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P600 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Quadro P600
The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P600 scores 3,318 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P600 is built on Pascal while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro P600) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,318 | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+300% | 96 |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz+20% | 1350 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P600 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has 0 MB. The Quadro P600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro P600) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P600 draws 40W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs's 28W — a 35.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P600) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 28W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.0 | 118.3+43% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.3 (Quadro P600) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P600 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | February 7 2017 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #558 | #536 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P600 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
