G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

Why buy it

✅6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,858 vs 16,581).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
197.4% HIGHER MSRP
$800 MSRPvs$269 MSRP

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅+52.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $531 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
✅Delivers 354.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅+52.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $531 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
✅Delivers 354.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,858 vs 16,581).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
197.4% HIGHER MSRP
$800 MSRPvs$269 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Quadro RTX 3000?

Yes. Radeon RX 7600 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro RTX 3000 averages 6.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 16,581 vs 10,858 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7600 is a 2023 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Quadro RTX 3000 is a 2018 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, 52.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7600 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 7600 is about $531 cheaper on MSRP at $269 MSRP versus $800 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 52.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 354.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro RTX 3000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro RTX 3000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $800 MSRP, even if Radeon RX 7600 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 3000 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	123 FPS	168 FPS
medium	113 FPS	149 FPS
high	98 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	106 FPS	140 FPS
medium	91 FPS	114 FPS
high	77 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	56 FPS	85 FPS
medium	50 FPS	72 FPS
high	41 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	52 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open Radeon RX 7600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	451 FPS	414 FPS
medium	391 FPS	349 FPS
high	317 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	206 FPS
1440p
low	296 FPS	241 FPS
medium	244 FPS	205 FPS
high	211 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	143 FPS	109 FPS
medium	126 FPS	91 FPS
high	108 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	57 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open Radeon RX 7600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	489 FPS	746 FPS
medium	391 FPS	597 FPS
high	326 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	366 FPS	560 FPS
medium	293 FPS	448 FPS
high	244 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	280 FPS
4K
low	244 FPS	373 FPS
medium	195 FPS	298 FPS
high	163 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	187 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open Radeon RX 7600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	489 FPS	604 FPS
medium	391 FPS	517 FPS
high	326 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	366 FPS	468 FPS
medium	293 FPS	397 FPS
high	244 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	259 FPS
4K
low	244 FPS	293 FPS
medium	195 FPS	271 FPS
high	163 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	187 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open Radeon RX 7600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 3000 and Radeon RX 7600

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Radeon RX 7600

The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 3000 scores 10,858 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 52.7%. The Quadro RTX 3000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 576 Tensor cores.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
G3D Mark Score	10,858	16,581+53%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4608+125%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.31 TFLOPS	21.75 TFLOPS+33%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz	2655 MHz+50%
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	288+125%	128
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+800%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	72+125%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 3000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 3000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 3000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 44.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	Radeon RX 7600
TDP	260W	165W-37%
Recommended PSU	500W-9%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	0mm	240mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	41.8	100.5+140%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 3000 launched at $800 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 66.4% less ($531 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.6 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 352.9% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).