Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $5,500 for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation, it costs 95% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1830.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1830.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 5.3%. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 320 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964+5% | 28,454 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 18176+610% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+1040% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2505 MHz+61% |
| ROPs | 64 | 192+200% |
| TMUs | 160 | 568+255% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 17.8 MB+612% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 142+255% |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | 568+78% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-63% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+187% | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799 and now averages $5500. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 94.5% less ($5200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 99.9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 5.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 1821.2% better value. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-87% | $6799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-95% | $5500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.9+1821% | 5.2 |
| Codename | TU104 | AD102 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #201 | #24 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and RTX 6000 Ada Generation
