
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
2019Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5700 XT make more sense than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 64 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 456 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,675 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,675+2% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.294 TFLOPS+8% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1499 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 47.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-38% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 158.4+66% | 95.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #208 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













